Managing risk in industrial construction projects in Latin America

ndustrial construction projects in Latin America offer significant growth opportunities, but they also involve a complex risk environment. Factors such as regulatory variability, supply chain constraints, labor conditions, logistics challenges, and market volatility require structured and proactive risk management strategies.

For industrial investors, manufacturers, and developers, effectively managing risk is a decisive factor in achieving cost certainty, schedule reliability, safety performance, and long‑term operational success.

This article outlines the main risks associated with industrial construction projects in Latin America and presents best practices to mitigate them.

‍

‍

Understanding risk in industrial construction

Risk in industrial construction is not limited to unforeseen events. It includes any condition that can negatively impact:

• Project cost
• Schedule
• Quality and performance
• Safety
• Regulatory compliance

In Latin America, risks tend to be interconnected, meaning that issues in one area (for example, permitting delays) can rapidly affect engineering, procurement, and construction activities.

‍

‍

Key risk categories in Latin American industrial projects

1. Regulatory and permitting risk

Regulatory frameworks in Latin America vary significantly by country, state, and municipality. Common challenges include:

• Lengthy and unpredictable permitting timelines
• Changes in regulatory interpretation
• Environmental licensing requirements
• Local authority approval dependencies

Without early regulatory engagement, projects may face delays, redesign, or scope changes during execution.

‍

2. Engineering and scope definition risk

Incomplete or poorly defined engineering is one of the main sources of risk in industrial projects. In Latin America, this risk is amplified by:

• Late adaptation of international designs to local codes
• Incomplete site data and surveys
• Scope gaps between disciplines
• Late client or stakeholder decisions

Strong engineering definition and early design maturity are critical to controlling downstream risks.

‍

‍

3. Procurement and supply chain risk

Industrial projects in the region often depend on imported equipment and specialized systems. Key procurement risks include:

• Long lead times for critical equipment
• Customs clearance delays
• Limited availability of qualified local suppliers
• Currency fluctuations and cost volatility

Procurement risks directly impact schedule and cost, especially in fast‑track projects.

‍

4. Construction execution risk

Construction risks are closely linked to local conditions and practices. Common challenges include:

• Labor availability and productivity
• Safety management in multi‑contractor environments
• Site logistics and access constraints
• Interface management between trades and contractors

Inadequate construction planning can result in delays, rework, and safety incidents.

‍

5. Contractual and commercial risk

Poorly structured contracts often lead to disputes and claims. In Latin America, risks include:

• Unclear scope allocation
• Misaligned risk transfer
• Inconsistent contract conditions between packages
• Weak change management procedures

Selecting the appropriate delivery model (EPC, EPCM, or hybrid) is fundamental to managing contractual exposure.

‍

‍

Best practices for managing risk in industrial construction

1. Early risk identification and assessment

Effective risk management starts in the early project phases. Best practices include:

• Structured risk workshops
• Identification of critical path risks
• Quantitative and qualitative risk analysis
• Continuous risk register updates

Early visibility allows mitigation actions before risks materialize.

‍

‍

2. Strong engineering definition and integration

Robust engineering reduces uncertainty across the project lifecycle. This includes:

• Clear scope definition
• Multidisciplinary coordination
• Constructability reviews
• Alignment between engineering and construction sequencing

Engineering maturity is one of the strongest risk mitigation tools.

‍

‍

3. Integrated procurement planning

Procurement strategies should be aligned with project risks and schedule constraints by:

• Identifying long‑lead items early
• Developing sourcing strategies (local vs imported)
• Engaging suppliers during engineering phases
• Monitoring market and logistics conditions

Integrated planning reduces exposure to supply chain disruptions.

‍

‍

4. Experienced local execution teams

Local expertise plays a critical role in risk mitigation by:

• Navigating regulatory and permitting processes
• Managing local contractors and labor
• Adapting execution strategies to site realities
• Anticipating regional challenges

Local execution capability combined with international standards is a key success factor.

‍

5. Clear governance and communication

Strong project governance supports risk control through:

• Defined decision‑making structures
• Clear communication channels
• Consistent reporting and controls
• Proactive change management

Transparency and alignment reduce uncertainty and reactive decision‑making.

‍

The role of EPC and EPCM in risk management

Both EPC and EPCM models can be effective in managing risk when properly applied:

• EPC offers single‑point responsibility and greater cost and schedule certainty
• EPCM provides flexibility and transparency, with higher client involvement

The choice depends on project complexity, risk appetite, and internal capabilities.

‍

‍

Managing risk in industrial construction projects in Latin America requires a structured, proactive, and integrated approach. By addressing regulatory, engineering, procurement, construction, and contractual risks early, project stakeholders can significantly improve project outcomes.

Successful risk management is not about eliminating uncertainty, but about anticipating challenges, making informed decisions, and executing with discipline.